Back to blog
Web Scraping·July 27, 2026·18 min read

Cheapest Scraping API for High Volume: 12 Providers Priced (2026)

We priced 12 scraping APIs on 25 Oct 2026. Most bill only successes, so JS-rendering and proxy multipliers decide the cheapest scraping API at high volume.

A

Arun Singh

Anakin Team

Two bar charts contrasting scraping API billing models: one bar showing a portion paid for failed requests, the other showing a shorter bar billed only for successful results

Cheapest Scraping API for High Volume: 12 Providers Priced (2026)

If you're pricing a scraping API for millions of requests a month, the number on the pricing page is rarely the number on your invoice. JavaScript rendering, premium proxies and anti-bot surcharges multiply the credits a single request burns, and providers disagree on what counts as a "successful" request.

So we re-checked the live pricing pages of twelve scraping APIs on 25 October 2026 to answer one question: which one stays cheap once your targets get hard? The short answer: billing only on success is now standard, so the cheapest reliable API is the one whose per-request cost doesn't multiply when a page needs a browser or a better proxy. We cover the cost mechanics first, then each provider, then which one to pick for your workload.

Key takeaways

  • Most major scraping APIs now bill only successful requests, so the bigger cost driver is credit multipliers: rendering and premium proxies cost 5x to 75x a basic request on ScrapingBee and ScraperAPI, and up to 25x on ZenRows
  • Browser rendering costs 5x a basic request on ZenRows and ScrapingBee, 10x on ScraperAPI and roughly 8x to 13x on Zyte, so use it only for JavaScript-heavy targets
  • Premium or residential proxy requests cost about 10x a basic request on ZenRows, ScraperAPI and ScrapingBee, but are necessary for geo-restricted content and high-blocking sites
  • Check what counts as a success: ScraperAPI bills 404s, ScrapingBee bills 404s and 410s, and Oxylabs bills every 4xx response, including 403 blocks
  • On entry plans, a million basic requests costs from about $110 (Scrape.do) to $1,500 (Bright Data pay-as-you-go), before any rendering or proxy multiplier

What makes a scraping API cost-effective at high volume

At high volume, the cheapest scraping API is the one that charges only for successful requests and handles anti-bot complexity without multiplying your credit burn. Most major providers now meet the first condition. The second is where they differ.

Per-request cost structure vs. failure-refund policies

Most APIs advertise a clean per-1,000-requests figure: ScraperAPI starts at $0.49 on its Hobby plan, ZenRows at $0.28 on Launch, Bright Data at $1.50 per 1,000 records pay-as-you-go. ZenRows, ScraperAPI, ScrapingBee and Bright Data all say they bill only successful requests, so failed calls are no longer the main leak. The leak is in the definition of success. ScraperAPI counts 200 and 404 responses as billable, ScrapingBee adds 410, and Oxylabs bills any 4xx, 403 blocks included. If a provider bills blocks, a 10-15% block rate on protected targets inflates your effective cost by about the same percentage.

Anti-bot bypass methods: proxy rotation vs. browser rendering

Standard HTTP scraping with proxy rotation handles static pages cheaply, but JavaScript-heavy targets need full browser rendering, and most providers price that as a multiple of a basic request: 5 credits on ZenRows and ScrapingBee, 10 on ScraperAPI, roughly 8x to 13x on Zyte's tiers. Anakin's URL Scraper charges 1 credit per page with optional JS rendering at the same rate, per its pricing page. If 40% of your targets need a browser, that multiplier, not the base rate, decides your bill.

Proxy diversity as a cost variable

Premium or residential proxies are the second multiplier. ZenRows, ScraperAPI and ScrapingBee each charge 10 credits for a premium-proxy request and 25 once JS rendering is added. ScrapingBee's stealth proxy and ScraperAPI's ultra-premium proxy with rendering reach 75. At high volume, the question isn't whether to use residential proxies, it's whether the provider's success rate on your targets justifies the premium. Anakin routes requests through residential proxies with a country parameter across 207 countries, and its Browser API lists geo-targeting as free, with no per-country surcharge.

With those multipliers in mind, here's how the providers compare side by side.

Comparison overview: 12 APIs side by side

The web scraping market is valued at USD 1.56 billion in 2026 and projected to reach USD 4.03 billion by 2032 (Mordor Intelligence 2026), and new pricing models keep appearing as it grows. Picking an API means understanding how each provider handles cost, failure and anti-bot defenses under production load. The table below compares Anakin with the providers covered in this post, plus a few more pay-per-success options, on base cost per 1,000 requests, browser-rendering cost, failure handling and anti-bot method.

Evaluation criteria recap

The comparison uses four columns to expose material differences in total cost of ownership:

  • Base cost per 1,000 requests, the published rate for standard (non-JS) scraping on the lowest paid tier
  • Browser-rendering cost, the multiplier or surcharge when JavaScript execution is required
  • Failure-handling policy, whether failed requests consume credits or are automatically refunded
  • Anti-bot method, the primary technique (proxy rotation, fingerprint spoofing, intelligent retry) the API uses to bypass blocks

These dimensions matter because the cost-per-request on a pricing page leaves out the two largest hidden costs: failures you pay for (when the API bills blocked requests) and JS-rendering overhead (when your target needs headless Chrome). A $0.50 per 1K standard rate becomes about $0.56 per 1,000 delivered results when 10% of requests fail and you still pay for them, and $2.50 per 1K when every request needs browser rendering at a 5x multiplier. The multiplier is the bigger number.

API Base cost per 1K Browser-rendering cost Failure handling Anti-bot method
Anakin 1 credit per page: $3.80 (Pro), $1.00 (Scale), $0.71 (Business); 300 free credits Same 1 credit per page; Browser API 1 credit / 2 min Charged only on success; cache hits free Residential proxy routing, 207 countries; stealth browser
ScrapingBee $0.25 with rendering off (Hobby) 5 credits (on by default) Bills 200, 404 and 410 only Premium (10-25 credits) and stealth (75) proxies
Bright Data $1.50 pay-as-you-go; $1.30 over Scale's 384K records Priced per record Successful deliveries only 400M+ residential IPs, CAPTCHA solving
ScraperAPI $0.49 (Hobby) 10 credits (render=true) Bills 200 and 404 only Rotating proxies, auto-retry; +10 credits on Cloudflare, DataDome, PerimeterX
Apify Compute units: $0.20 (Starter) to $0.13 (Business) Depends on actor runtime Billed by compute used Actor-dependent
ZenRows $0.42 (Build); $0.28 (Launch) 5× multiplier Failed requests never charged Premium proxies (10×), JS + premium 25×
Scrapingdog $0.20 (Lite) 5 credits Failed, blocked, timed-out refunded Rotating and premium proxies
Scrape.do $0.11 (Hobby); 1,000 free Included in plan Only valid successful responses Residential and mobile proxies, JS rendering
Zyte $0.13 (tier 1) to $1.27 (tier 5) $1.01 to $16.08 per 1K (~8-13×) Priced per successful response Site-difficulty tiering
Scrappey €0.10 (~$0.11) €1.00 per 1K (~10×) Pay-per-success Full-browser automation
Oxylabs $0.50 (Starter, $30/mo) Higher per-result rate with JS Bills 2xx and 4xx (incl. 403); 5xx, 6xx, 429 free Proxy network + JS rendering
Decodo $0.50 (standard proxy) $0.75 per 1K (~1.5×) Successful requests only Standard and premium proxy pools

Prices per 1,000 basic requests on each provider's public pricing page, checked 25 October 2026. Rates fall on higher-volume plans; these are list prices, not independently benchmarked figures.

Two things stand out. Almost every row now says pay-per-success, so failure handling no longer separates the field, though what counts as a success still does, as Oxylabs' 4xx rule shows. And the browser column runs from "same price" to 13x. Anakin's URL Scraper charges 1 credit per page with or without JS rendering, and its separate Browser API, for full Playwright or Puppeteer control, bills 1 credit per 2 minutes of session time. ZenRows and ScrapingBee charge 5 credits for a rendered request and ScraperAPI 10, so ScraperAPI's $0.49 per 1K Hobby base becomes $4.90 per 1K when every request needs headless Chrome.

Cost-per-million-request modeling under realistic failure rates

Pricing pages rarely model cost per million requests under realistic failure rates (5 to 15% blocks). The worked example below contrasts two billing models: no-refund (you pay for failed requests) and auto-refund (you pay only for successful data).

Scenario: 1 million requests at a 10% block rate, base cost $0.50 per 1K.

  • No-refund billing, you submit 1M requests, 900K succeed, 100K fail. You pay for all 1M: (1,000,000 / 1,000) × $0.50 = $500. Effective cost per successful request: $500 / 900,000 = $0.56 per 1K.
  • Auto-refund billing, you submit 1M requests, 900K succeed, 100K fail and are refunded. You pay for 900K: (900,000 / 1,000) × $0.50 = $450. Effective cost per successful request: $450 / 900,000 = $0.50 per 1K.

At 10% failure, auto-refund saves $50 per million requests. At 15%, the delta grows to $75 per million, and at 10M requests a month that's $500 to $750, enough to offset a higher published rate. Anakin, ScraperAPI, ScrapingBee, ZenRows, Bright Data, Scrapingdog, Scrape.do, Scrappey, Zyte and Decodo all publish pay-per-success billing, so this saving is now the baseline, not a differentiator. Where it still bites is a provider that bills blocks as successes, like Oxylabs with 4xx responses. Confirm the rule in writing before you commit.

Bar chart showing 900,000 successfully delivered requests against 100,000 failed requests that are still billed by most scraping APIs, out of 1 million total requests at a 10% block rate

The cost modeling above assumes standard (non-JS) scraping. When your targets need JavaScript rendering (single-page applications, dynamically loaded content, CAPTCHA-protected pages), the 5x multiplier on ZenRows and ScrapingBee turns a $0.50 base rate into $2.50, and ScraperAPI's 10x turns it into $5.00. Anakin's URL Scraper keeps a rendered page at 1 credit. For persistent sessions, authenticated scraping or complex interaction flows, the Browser API bills 1 credit per 2 minutes of session time, which decouples cost from request count.

ScrapingBee: browser rendering on by default

ScrapingBee is the clearest case of rendering-first pricing. Its Hobby plan is $19 a month for 75,000 credits, and JavaScript rendering is on by default at 5 credits a request, about $1.27 per 1,000 rendered requests (or about $0.25 per 1,000 with rendering off). In Scrapeway's September 2026 benchmark the average request took 2.8 seconds, which fits a browser-first API. ScrapingBee bills only successful requests, defined as 200, 404 or 410 responses.

Pricing tiers and browser-rendering cost

Every ScrapingBee plan includes headless Chrome rendering, but it isn't free. A rendered request costs 5 credits against 1 for plain HTTP, premium proxies take a request to 10 or 25 credits, and stealth proxies to 75. Static pages are cheaper with rendering off, which the second call in the example below uses.

When ScrapingBee fits high-volume workloads

ScrapingBee suits pipelines scraping JavaScript-heavy sites where browser rendering is mandatory and the 5-credit default is the norm anyway. For HTTP-only workloads, turn rendering off, or compare lower basic rates like Scrape.do's $0.11 per 1,000.

# ScrapingBee - render_js defaults to true (5 credits); disable it for 1 credit
curl "https://app.scrapingbee.com/api/v1?url=https://example.com" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY"

# Standard HTTP only (1 credit)
curl "https://app.scrapingbee.com/api/v1?url=https://example.com&render_js=False" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY"

Bright Data: enterprise proxy network + scraper

Residential proxy pool and geo-routing coverage

Bright Data operates one of the industry's largest residential proxy networks, with more than 400 million IPs across 195 countries by its own count. That infrastructure makes it a common choice for teams scraping geo-restricted content or high-blocking targets that reject datacenter proxies. The Web Scraper API includes automated proxy rotation, CAPTCHA solving and unlimited concurrency out of the box. Residential traffic does cost more per request than datacenter-pool alternatives. Bright Data's routing also supports worldwide geotargeting and user-agent rotation, which help keep success rates up on sites with sophisticated anti-bot defenses. For enterprises that need coverage at scale, that proxy diversity can justify the higher per-request cost.

Enterprise-tier pricing and the free tier

Bright Data's Web Scraper API runs $1.50 per 1,000 records pay-as-you-go, or $499 a month for 384,000 records on the Scale plan, with additional records at $1.30 per 1,000. It charges only for successful deliveries, and a free tier covers 5,000 records a month, so a pilot no longer needs the $499 commitment. The platform's strength is enterprise-scale infrastructure: unlimited concurrency, full browser rendering and data parsing to JSON or CSV. Teams evaluating cost per successful request should still compare Bright Data's $1.30 per 1K overage rate against simpler pay-as-you-go APIs that start below $0.50 per 1K.

# Bright Data - trigger an async collection against a dataset
curl -X POST https://api.brightdata.com/datasets/v3/trigger \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '[
    {"url": "https://example.com/product/1"},
    {"url": "https://example.com/product/2"}
  ]' \
  -G -d "dataset_id=gd_your_dataset_id"

# Response includes a snapshot_id used to poll for results

ScraperAPI: simple API with auto-retry

Auto-retry and proxy rotation

ScraperAPI handles proxy rotation and CAPTCHA solving automatically, and when a request fails it retries with a different proxy, transparent to the caller. Its credit docs say only successful requests (200 and 404 responses) are charged, so blocked retries don't stack on your bill. The variability comes from elsewhere. render=true costs 10 credits, premium proxies 10 and ultra-premium 30, and the pricing page lists an extra 10 credits for sites behind Cloudflare, DataDome or PerimeterX. On bot-protected e-commerce targets, the effective per-request cost can climb well past the base rate.

Diagram contrasting a rising staircase of per-request charges across three blocked retries against a flat, evenly spaced timeline representing Anakin's session-based billing

Volume-tier pricing and cost predictability

ScraperAPI's Hobby plan starts at $49 a month for 100,000 API credits with 20 concurrent threads. JS rendering costs 10 credits per call. Hobby and Startup geotarget the US and EU only, and Business ($299) and higher tiers add country-level targeting. The 7-day trial includes 5,000 credits with no card required, enough to see how your targets price out before committing. Anakin also charges only for successful requests, and a rendered page costs the same 1 credit as a plain one, so the cost per delivered record stays flat as targets get harder.

# ScraperAPI - render=true routes through headless Chrome (10 credits vs 1)
curl "https://api.scraperapi.com/?api_key=YOUR_API_KEY&url=https://example.com&render=true"

# Standard HTTP request (1 credit)
curl "https://api.scraperapi.com/?api_key=YOUR_API_KEY&url=https://example.com"

Apify: actor-based scraping platform

Actor compute units and cost model

Apify bills by compute-unit consumption rather than per request. Compute units cost $0.20 each on the Free and Starter plans, falling to $0.16 on Scale and $0.13 on Business, and many Store actors are instead priced per event on the actor's own page. The final expense depends on actor runtime and memory allocation, so JavaScript-heavy tasks and long-running crawlers accumulate units faster than static-page extractions. Teams running high-volume pipelines need to profile actor resource use carefully, because a misconfigured actor can drain credits before the data threshold is reached. The model rewards optimization: efficient actors deliver lower per-record costs than unoptimized scripts.

When Apify's flexibility justifies higher cost

Apify's actor library and custom workflow orchestration justify premium pricing when teams need deep customization of scraping logic. Pre-built actors handle platform-specific scraping patterns without custom code, and the actor store provides community-maintained scrapers for niche sites. If pre-built scrapers for popular sites are what you need, Anakin's Wire catalog covers more than 970 sites (as of 25 October 2026) with ready-made actions billed from the same credit balance as the URL Scraper. For engineering teams with time to build and maintain custom actors, Apify's infrastructure control outweighs the compute-unit overhead.

# Apify - run an actor synchronously and wait for the result
curl -X POST https://api.apify.com/v2/actors/YOUR_ACTOR_ID/run-sync \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_TOKEN"

# Async alternative: POST .../runs, then poll the run status separately.
# Cost scales with actor compute-unit consumption, not a flat per-call rate.

ZenRows: anti-bot bypass focus

Anti-bot bypass technology and success rates

ZenRows positions itself around anti-bot evasion, offering browser fingerprinting resistance and CAPTCHA-solving infrastructure. In Scrapeway's September 2026 run across protected targets, ZenRows averaged a 22.1% success rate against ScrapingBee's 33.2%, with wide swings by site (83.1% on Etsy, 12.9% on Indeed). The platform's anti-bot features target pages behind Cloudflare, DataDome and similar protection layers, where basic HTTP requests typically fail. (Scrapeway 2026)

Protected-page scraping requires premium proxies and JavaScript rendering, both of which ZenRows supports at multiplied cost. The 22.1% average suggests these features improve reach but don't guarantee universal bypass, so teams evaluating ZenRows should expect mixed reliability depending on target site defenses.

Pricing tiers and browser-rendering premium

ZenRows bills on a shared balance across all products. On the Launch plan ($69 for 250,000 credits), basic pages cost $0.28 per 1,000 requests, falling to $0.11 on Scale. JavaScript rendering applies a 5x multiplier ($1.38 per 1,000), premium proxies 10x ($2.76), and both together 25x ($6.90 per 1,000). Failed requests are never charged, and 404 and 410 responses count as successful. Scrapeway's benchmark listed an average cost of $3.47 for ZenRows and $1.51 for ScrapingBee on its test set, which reflects how often protected targets push requests into the higher tiers.

# ZenRows - mode=auto applies Adaptive Stealth Mode automatically
curl "https://api.zenrows.com/v1/?apikey=YOUR_API_KEY&url=https://example.com&mode=auto"

# Explicit JS rendering + premium proxy (5x and 10x multipliers respectively)
curl "https://api.zenrows.com/v1/?apikey=YOUR_API_KEY&url=https://example.com&js_render=true&premium_proxy=true"

Scrapingdog, Scrape.do, Zyte, Scrappey, and Oxylabs: more pay-per-success options

Pay-per-success billing isn't unique to ScraperAPI or Anakin. Scrapingdog charges $0.20 per 1,000 requests on its Lite plan and refunds failed, blocked and timed-out requests to your balance, with a 100-credit free tier. Scrape.do offers 1,000 free successful credits monthly and $0.11 per 1,000 credits on its Hobby plan, billing only for requests that return valid content. Scrappey charges €0.10 per 1,000 direct HTTP requests and €1.00 per 1,000 full-browser requests, counting only successful requests toward usage. Zyte's pay-as-you-go tier starts at $0.13 per 1,000 successful responses for simple targets, rising to $1.27 for the hardest sites.

Oxylabs' billing rule has a narrower scope than the others. Its billing docs exclude 5xx and 6xx system errors, but 4xx responses, including the 403s that block rates actually produce, are billed as successful. That distinction matters more than headline pricing: a provider that refunds server errors but bills blocks hasn't solved the cost problem this comparison is about. Anakin charges only when a request succeeds, without carving out status codes, and keeps a JS-rendered page at the same 1 credit, so JavaScript-heavy workloads don't inherit the per-request multipliers some competitors apply to browser rendering. Zyte's browser tier costs roughly 8x to 13x its HTTP tier, Scrappey's roughly 10x.

A 403 status code stamped 'still billed' next to a small badge showing that only 5xx and 6xx system errors are refunded under Oxylabs' policy

Anakin: one credit per page, charged only on success

No charge for blocked or failed requests

Anakin charges credits only when a request succeeds. Failed scrapes, timeouts and cache hits are free, per its pricing FAQ. That matters most on heavily protected sites where block rates can reach 10 to 15%. ScraperAPI, ScrapingBee, ZenRows and Bright Data now bill only successful requests too, so the sharper difference is what a successful request costs: 1 credit per page on Anakin's URL Scraper, with or without JS rendering. On the Scale plan ($100 for 100,000 credits) that's $1.00 per 1,000 pages, and $0.71 on Business ($500 for 700,000).

# Anakin URL Scraper - async job, poll for the result
curl -X POST https://api.anakin.io/v1/url-scraper \
  -H "X-API-Key: YOUR_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "url": "https://example.com",
    "useBrowser": true,
    "country": "us",
    "formats": ["html", "markdown"]
  }'

# Response (202): {"jobId": "job_abc123xyz", "status": "pending"}
curl https://api.anakin.io/v1/url-scraper/job_abc123xyz \
  -H "X-API-Key: YOUR_API_KEY"

Browser API billing and credit rounding

Anakin's Browser API charges 1 credit per 2-minute interval, rounded up. Short-session requests under 2 minutes still consume 1 credit due to rounding. Because failed sessions refund automatically, the rounding overhead only applies to sessions that complete successfully.

# Anakin Browser API - CDP connection, billed by session time (1 credit / 2 min)
# pip install playwright
import asyncio
from playwright.async_api import async_playwright

async def main():
    async with async_playwright() as p:
        browser = await p.chromium.connect_over_cdp(
            "wss://api.anakin.io/v1/browser-connect?country=us",
            headers={"X-API-Key": "YOUR_API_KEY"},
        )
        page = browser.contexts[0].pages[0]
        await page.goto("https://example.com", wait_until="domcontentloaded")
        print(await page.title())
        await browser.close()

asyncio.run(main())
# Works with any CDP-compatible client: Playwright, Puppeteer, etc.
# save_session=<name> persists cookies/localStorage for reuse across requests
Bar chart comparing browser-rendering cost multipliers across scraping APIs: ZenRows and ScraperAPI at 5x, Zyte at roughly 8x, and Scrappey at roughly 10x, next to Anakin's flat 1x session-based rate

Where Anakin's pricing pulls ahead

At a 10% block rate, 1M requests cost 900K credits with Anakin, since the 100K failures are free. ScraperAPI, ScrapingBee, ZenRows and Bright Data also skip failed requests, so the gap opens elsewhere. On a Cloudflare-protected target that needs a browser and a premium proxy, ScraperAPI prices the request at 25 credits and ScrapingBee and ZenRows at 25 too, while an Anakin URL Scraper request with rendering stays at 1 credit. Anakin's proxy routing across 207 countries reduces failures in the first place, and when blocks do occur, they cost nothing.

Strengths: Charged only on success, 1 credit per page with or without JS rendering, proxy routing across 207 countries. Limitations: Browser API rounding overhead on short sessions. Best For: High-volume users who want predictable cost per record when targets mix static and JavaScript-heavy pages, and teams scraping protected sites where multipliers would otherwise dominate the bill.

Those per-provider numbers only turn into a decision once you map them to the kind of pages you scrape.

Horizontal bar chart ranking ScrapingBee, Bright Data, ScraperAPI, Apify, and ZenRows by their published base cost per 1,000 requests, with Anakin shown separately since it is not priced per request

Cost-efficiency breakdown by use case

E-commerce price monitoring: standard HTTP vs. browser rendering

For e-commerce sites serving static price data, standard HTTP scraping delivers the lowest per-request cost. ScraperAPI's Hobby plan ($49 a month for 100,000 credits) and Anakin's URL Scraper (1 credit per page) both handle non-JavaScript workflows. When product pages need JS rendering (React-based SPAs, lazy-loaded pricing), the cost profiles split. ScraperAPI's render=true uses 10 credits per call, which works out to $4.90 per 1,000 rendered requests on Hobby and $1.49 on Startup. On Anakin's Scale plan ($100 for 100,000 credits), a rendered page costs the same $1.00 per 1,000 as a static one.

SERP data and social media: geo-routing and residential proxies

SERP and social scraping need residential proxies and country-level geo-targeting to get past rate limits and reach localized content. Bright Data positions its proxy infrastructure (400M+ IPs) (Bright Data 2026) for enterprise-scale use cases, at $1.50 per 1,000 records pay-as-you-go or $499 a month for 384,000 records. ScraperAPI's geotargeting (US and EU on Hobby and Startup, country-level from Business) and automatic proxy rotation serve mid-volume needs at $49 to $299 a month. For teams scraping 50+ geolocations at once, Bright Data's proxy diversity can justify its higher entry price, while smaller operations can start on ScraperAPI's $49 plan. Anakin routes through residential proxies in 207 countries with a single country parameter, and for search results specifically, its Search API returns ranked results with snippets and citations at 3 credits per call.

Side-by-side comparison of Anakin's 207-country proxy routing against Bright Data's 400 million plus residential IP pool, contrasting geographic reach with raw IP volume

Job boards and high-blocking sites: refund policies under high failure rates

Job boards and other protected platforms can block a large share of requests even with proxy rotation. Take 100,000 monthly requests with 20% failures. An API that bills every attempt charges for 100,000 and delivers 80,000, so at ScraperAPI's Hobby rate ($0.49 per 1,000) the effective cost would be about $0.61 per 1,000 results. ScraperAPI actually bills only the 80,000 successes, about $39, which keeps the effective rate at $0.49 per 1,000, a 20% saving. Anakin also bills only successful jobs, so both suit high-blocking use cases. The bigger risk on these sites is the multiplier when a page needs rendering or a premium proxy.

Choosing the right scraping API for your workload

Bright Data offers the broadest residential proxy pool, from $1.50 per 1,000 records pay-as-you-go or $499 a month on Scale. ScrapingBee and ZenRows earn their 5x rendering multiplier on JavaScript-heavy or CAPTCHA-protected sites, and for purely static pages at very high volume, budget HTTP APIs like Scrape.do ($0.11 per 1,000) and Scrapingdog ($0.20) have the lowest base rates. The cheapest reliable option depends on your mix of static and rendered pages and how hard your targets fight back. If that mix varies, Anakin's flat 1 credit per page, rendered or not, plus charge-only-on-success billing keeps the cost per delivered record predictable as targets get harder.

As bot detection gets more aggressive, scraping APIs will differentiate less on headline per-request pricing and more on what a hard request costs. Teams evaluating total cost of ownership should model realistic block rates and rendering shares, not just advertised per-1,000-request figures.

The number on the pricing page and the number on the invoice only match once you know your block rate and your rendering share. Run a sample of your own targets through Anakin's URL Scraper on the free Starter plan's 300 credits, then compare the cost per successful record against the numbers above.

Frequently asked questions

Do you pay for blocked requests with every scraping API?

No. Anakin, ScraperAPI, ScrapingBee, ZenRows, Bright Data, Scrapingdog, Scrape.do, Scrappey and Zyte all say they bill only successful requests. Check what counts as a success: ScraperAPI bills 200 and 404 responses, ScrapingBee adds 410, and Oxylabs bills every 4xx, including 403 blocks. At a 10% block rate, 1M requests cost 900K credits with pay-per-success billing versus 1M billable requests without it.

Which scraping API refunds failed requests automatically?

Anakin charges only when a request succeeds, so failed scrapes and timeouts are free, and Scrapingdog refunds failed, blocked and timed-out requests to your balance. ScraperAPI, ScrapingBee, ZenRows and Bright Data also bill only successful requests. Oxylabs is the exception in this comparison: it skips its own 5xx and 6xx errors but bills 4xx responses.

When should you use browser rendering vs. standard HTTP scraping?

Browser rendering costs 5x a basic request on ZenRows and ScrapingBee, 10x on ScraperAPI and roughly 8x to 13x on Zyte, so use it only for JavaScript-heavy or CAPTCHA-protected sites. For static price pages, standard HTTP is the cheapest option on most providers. Anakin's URL Scraper charges the same 1 credit per page with or without JS rendering.

What do premium or residential proxies cost compared with datacenter IPs?

Premium or residential proxy requests cost about 10x a basic request on ZenRows, ScraperAPI and ScrapingBee, and 25x once JS rendering is added. They're worth it for geo-restricted content or targets that reject datacenter IPs. Bright Data runs one of the largest residential networks, more than 400 million IPs, and Anakin routes requests through residential proxies in 207 countries via a country parameter.

How do you calculate per-million-request cost under realistic block rates?

At a 10% block rate, 1M requests consume 900K credits with pay-per-success APIs (100K failures free) versus 1M billable credits with pay-per-call models. Then account for the share of requests that need rendering or premium proxies, since those cost 5x to 25x a basic request on most providers. Anakin's Browser API charges 1 credit per 2-minute interval, rounded up, so sessions under 2 minutes still consume 1 credit.

Which scraping API has the highest success rate for anti-bot bypass?

No provider tops every target. In Scrapeway's September 2026 benchmark, ScrapingBee averaged 33.2% and ZenRows 22.1% across protected sites, with results swinging widely by site. Bright Data's residential network of more than 400 million IPs helps on geo-restricted content and targets that reject datacenter proxies. Test your own targets before committing.

What uptime SLA should you expect from a scraping API?

SLA terms vary by provider and aren't always published. Bright Data lists a premium SLA on its Enterprise plan, and Anakin's Enterprise plan includes SLA guarantees. Anakin's self-serve plans don't list one, but because only successful requests are charged, downtime doesn't turn into wasted spend. Ask for uptime commitments in writing before you sign.

Sources

  1. Best Web Scraping APIs [2026 Benchmark] - ZenRows - www.zenrows.com (2026)
  2. Best Web Scraping APIs in 2026: Complete Comparison Guide - fastsoftware.uk (2026)
  3. Web Scraping API Comparison In-Depth: Speed, Reliability, or Price - github.com
  4. 7 Firecrawl Alternatives by Use Case - Nimble - www.nimbleway.com (2026)
  5. Web Scraping API Cost in 2026: Pricing Models Compared - AlterLab - alterlab.io (2026)
  6. ScrapingBee vs ZenRows: Scraping API Benchmark 2026 - scrapeway.com (2026)
  7. Web Scraping Tools Pricing 2026: Apify, ScraperAPI, ScrapingBee, Br... - konabayev.com (2026)
  8. Best Web Scraping APIs Compared: 2026 Pricing & Performance Guide - www.proxies.sx (2026)